Evolution

[Angrboda]

I say.........dead things can not bring any life only something alive can create life therefore considering that all life in this universe is alive and made of vibrations that clearly means that life in this universe come from something alive therefore vibrations are alive.

Nobody gives a shit what you "say" if it's just a bare assertion.  How would you know what a dead thing can or cannot do, since according to you, there are no dead things? You can't draw conclusions about something you claim doesn't exist.  That's the fallacy of the stolen concept, and that invalidates your entire argument.  You're just arguing in a circle, like always.  No, I can't prove that life came from non-life, but you can't prove that it didn't.  Which leaves you high and dry without an argument, as your claim that "dead things can not bring any life" is just an unsupported assertion.  I can reject those all day with impunity.  That's all you ever bring.

Her counterpoint again.........but you haven't proved that vibrations are alive...

Which is all that needs to be said if it's true.  That you don't think it's true is obvious, but since you never bother to respond to the counter-arguments, what else can we assume?  Regardless, I haven't responded as you claim, as each time I've given specific logical reasons for rejecting your arguments.  

This VL is what is going on every single time with yog.
Her counterpoints are all full of ego.  

Counterpoints which you never bother to answer.  I've given specific reasons for my dismissal of all your arguments.  I haven't simply said "but you haven't proved that vibrations are alive," which makes you nothing but a liar.  I proved that the last time you claimed that I was just dismissing your arguments out of hand (HERE).  You're a terrible liar, Rik, especially because everybody can see the evidence that I didn't do as you claim.