Evolution

[Little Rik]

I say.........dead things can not bring any life only something alive can create life therefore considering that all life in this universe is alive and made of vibrations that clearly means that life in this universe come from something alive therefore vibrations are alive.

Nobody gives a shit what you "say" if it's just a bare assertion.  How would you know what a dead thing can or cannot do, since according to you, there are no dead things?  You can't draw conclusions about something you claim doesn't exist.  That's the fallacy of the stolen concept, and that invalidates your entire argument.  You're just arguing in a circle, like always.  No, I can't prove that life came from non-life, but you can't prove that it didn't.  Which leaves you high and dry without an argument, as your claim that "dead things can not bring any life" is just an unsupported assertion.  I can reject those all day with impunity.  That's all you ever bring.

Her counterpoint again.........but you haven't proved that vibrations are alive...

Which is all that needs to be said if it's true.  That you don't think it's true is obvious, but since you never bother to respond to the counter-arguments, what else can we assume?  Regardless, I haven't responded as you claim, as each time I've given specific logical reasons for rejecting your arguments.  

This VL is what is going on every single time with yog.
Her counterpoints are all full of ego.  

Counterpoints which you never bother to answer.  I've given specific reasons for my dismissal of all your arguments.  I haven't simply said "but you haven't proved that vibrations are alive," which makes you nothing but a liar.  I proved that the last time you claimed that I was just dismissing your arguments out of hand (HERE). You're a terrible liar, Rik, especially because everybody can see the evidence that I didn't do as you claim.

Since when you............have given specific logical reasons for rejecting my arguments?
That is a load o'crap yog.

All you keep on doing is...........asking to give evidence about something that nobody bother to find any evidence on the ground that doesn't make any sense such as thinking that a body (dead body) is able to create a new life within that parameter of consciousness.
Of course a dead person is still full of energy that will never get lost but a body void of consciousness can only give energy to worms and that form of energy carry the consciousness that match worms consciousness.

Your knowledge about consciousness is next to zero.
High consciousness can not possibly enter low form of life and low consciousness is unable to enter high form of life such as human life.
Everything goes and fit in the proper puzzle.

Since energy-consciousness is abstract in nature it will live so to speak in a vibration form until a proper medium is found in which this energy-consciousness will live.

Einstein and other scientists already established that all life in the universe is made of vibrations as I already showed to you in a previous link.
I found very very hypocritical to see that atheists in general say all the time that they believe in science but when this very science contradict them they start playing dirty and refuse to accept the verdict.

You are the perfect example of such hypocritical mentality.
Shame on you.  

---

Still waiting on that evidence that vibrations are living thing . And yup he has zero evidence that life as a fact must come from life in an originating sense.

Wrong again Mr. FOOL.

Einstein and other scientists already established that all life is made of vibrations and only something alive is able to give life.
Fail again son.

By the way I am still waiting for your claim that you know what the true nature of life is.
How long shell I wait for your explanation?