I think he's suggesting that it's because creationists and scientists while OPPOSITES so are very DIFFERENT - are similar in the sense they are both opposite ENDS....since what he believes is more moderate and 'has the best of both worlds' so is closed to the truth or something like that. What he believes is difference because it's more balanced, unlike the other two (science and creationism) which while COMPLETELY different are similar in the sense that HE believes they are both unbalanced and to the extreme....
And by science I think he doesn't mean science in general, but science that is against/thinks it disproves what he believes or something like that...
I think? (IF ONLY to check that I understand correctly I'm answering myself).
EvF
And by science I think he doesn't mean science in general, but science that is against/thinks it disproves what he believes or something like that...
I think? (IF ONLY to check that I understand correctly I'm answering myself).
EvF
