Evolution

[Angrboda]

I say.........dead things can not bring any life only something alive can create life therefore considering that all life in this universe is alive and made of vibrations that clearly means that life in this universe come from something alive therefore vibrations are alive.

Nobody gives a shit what you "say" if it's just a bare assertion.  How would you know what a dead thing can or cannot do, since according to you, there are no dead things?  You can't draw conclusions about something you claim doesn't exist.  That's the fallacy of the stolen concept, and that invalidates your entire argument.  You're just arguing in a circle, like always.  No, I can't prove that life came from non-life, but you can't prove that it didn't.  Which leaves you high and dry without an argument, as your claim that "dead things can not bring any life" is just an unsupported assertion.  I can reject those all day with impunity.  That's all you ever bring.

Her counterpoint again.........but you haven't proved that vibrations are alive...

Which is all that needs to be said if it's true.  That you don't think it's true is obvious, but since you never bother to respond to the counter-arguments, what else can we assume?  Regardless, I haven't responded as you claim, as each time I've given specific logical reasons for rejecting your arguments.

 

This VL is what is going on every single time with yog.
Her counterpoints are all full of ego.  

Counterpoints which you never bother to answer.  I've given specific reasons for my dismissal of all your arguments.  I haven't simply said "but you haven't proved that vibrations are alive," which makes you nothing but a liar.  I proved that the last time you claimed that I was just dismissing your arguments out of hand (HERE). You're a terrible liar, Rik, especially because everybody can see the evidence that I didn't do as you claim.

Since when you............have given specific logical reasons for rejecting my arguments?
That is a load o'crap yog.

I just did, in the very post you quoted, you lying sack of shit!

Jesus Christ!  Could you be any more obvious with your lying?!?



Show me one post where I responded to your arguments without providing logical reasons -- just one, motherfucker!

All you keep on doing is...........asking to give evidence about something that nobody bother to find any evidence on the ground that doesn't make any sense such as thinking that a body (dead body) is able to create a new life within that parameter of consciousness.

Yeah, I can't parse your English here.  Try restating it using shorter sentences.  I can't make heads or tails of this.

Of course a dead person is still full of energy that will never get lost but a body void of consciousness can only give energy to worms and that form of energy carry the consciousness that match worms consciousness.

Unless I've misunderstood you, there is no such thing as a body devoid of consciousness, as a body is made up of matter whose vibrations are themselves conscious.  Perhaps you simply haven't explained yourself well enough, but under your view that "vibrations are alive" and that “Everything in Life is Vibration” (Einstein), apparently everything, including so-called "dead matter" is conscious.  If I've misunderstood you then clarify your position.  If there indeed is matter/vibrations that aren't conscious, then how do you tell which matter is conscious and which isn't?

Your knowledge about consciousness is next to zero.

Seeing as your last two posts have been filled with lies about me, I'm not inclined to grant you any credibility here.

High consciousness can not possibly enter low form of life and low consciousness is unable to enter high form of life such as human life.
Everything goes and fit in the proper puzzle.

Since energy-consciousness is abstract in nature it will live so to speak in a vibration form until a proper medium is found in which this energy-consciousness will live.

Are you trying to say that some things are alive and some things are not?  From what I recall, you have said that all things are made of vibrations and all vibrations are alive?  I don't see how there can be dead things if those two things are true.  If you haven't claimed that, then please clarify what in nature is or isn't a conscious/alive vibration.  I'll hold off on counter-arguments until you clarify what you mean.

Einstein and other scientists already established that all life in the universe is made of vibrations as I already showed to you in a previous link.
I found very very hypocritical to see that atheists in general say all the time that they believe in science but when this very science contradict them they start playing dirty and refuse to accept the verdict.

You are the perfect example of such hypocritical mentality.
Shame on you.  

More lies!  Show me one post where I contradicted science or shove it.  Your claim of hypocrisy is just another lie.

But while we're on the subject of hypocrisy, I haven't done things like post a google search instead of answering arguments, or claimed that something is as "obvious" as water is wet, or dismissed my arguments out of hand by claiming that I was just being dismissive or that I had not provided logical reasons in my counter-arguments.  That's you who did all those things.  So, in addition to being a lying cunt, you're being a total hypocrite.