Evolution

[Little Rik]

So the life in matter is hidden or obscured, yet at the same time it's "obvious" and self evident.  You're talking out of both sides of your mouth.
Your own testimony was that the consciousness in base matter wasn't evident.  As usual, you're just being stupid and inconsistent.
It can't be both hidden and obvious.

As the vision of the sun can be obscured by clouds at the same time is obvious that the sun exist also pure matter can be obscured by her own lack of awareness that she is pure consciousness.
There is no contradiction among the two.

As we can not see the sun when is cloudy we also can not see life in matter when matter is matter.
We however can see consciousness in animals and humans because their consciousness has reached higher level of consciousness.

Fail once again Mrs FOOL.

You are the queen of hypocrite as well.
You say that you believe in science but science contradict the idea that life can come from non life.

Yet more bullshit about how I supposedly contradict science.  The last time you made this claim I challenged you to show one post where I contradicted science.  As usual, you shut your ignorant, lying yap and didn't respond.  The following entry from the Encyclopedia Britannica shows once again that you know fuckall about what you're talking about.

You bring evidence that life can come from non life and LR will cover you in pure gold. (24 carat)  
Organic compounds are NOT non life.
Remember that you FOOL.

We can not see life in it but life is there OBVIOUSLY otherwise that kind of matter wouldn't be there in the first place.
Where there is matter there is life.
Einstein and other scientists already established that.

ARE YOU MORE INTELLIGENT THAT TOP SCIENTISTS or you are just a little smart ass that pretend to know more than intelligent people?
Fail again yog.
Science contradict you, (ONCE AGAIN)

Abiogenesis, the idea that life arose from nonlife more than 3.5 billion years ago on Earth. Abiogenesis proposes that the first life-forms generated were very simple and through a gradual process became increasingly complex. Biogenesis, in which life is derived from the reproduction of other life, was presumably preceded by abiogenesis, which became impossible once Earth’s atmosphere assumed its present composition.

Although many equate abiogenesis with the archaic theory of spontaneous generation, the two ideas are quite different. According to the latter, complex life (e.g., a maggot or mouse) was thought to arise spontaneously and continually from nonliving matter. While the hypothetical process of spontaneous generation was disproved as early as the 17th century and decisively rejected in the 19th century, abiogenesis has been neither proved nor disproved.

Encyclopedia Britannica || Abiogenesis

As you can see this report say.........abiogenesis has been neither proved nor disproved............further more it does not bring any concrete evidence that life pop up from non life as has never been proved that organic compound are void of life.  

Maybe if you hadn't spent so much time with your head stuck up Sarkar's ass, you'd know something about science.  But instead, you wasted your life following a bunch of bullshit based on religious dogma.

1) How can you mention religion when in reality you do not know the difference between religion and spirituality?
2) So far all Sarkar predictions have proved correct.
Until the time in which one of Sarkar will be proven wrong your idea that Sarkar teach dogma is your usual fantasy.    

You almost write a book in order to keep alive a pure fantasy because the idea that life can come from non life is a pure fantasy.
. . . . .
Where the non life suppose to be yog?
Not in this universe so where?
Are you so so stupid to believe in a guess.

I haven't made a claim in the matter.  You on the other hand have made a claim, namely that vibrations are alive.  So far you've yet to provide any evidence or good reasons for your belief.  It's nothing more than wild, baseless guessing.  It's just a dogma you believe.  You might mock the things atheists believe, but at least none of us spent 40 years gazing at our navel based on bullshit dogma about the consciousness of vibrations.  That's you.  

And again the only thing you have to respond to my points with is lies and evasions.

Thousands of years of yoga thinkers and meditators and this is the best defense of their beliefs that you can come up with?

That's sad.  That's really, really sad.

Oh, is that true that you haven't make a claim?  
That is bizarre yog.  
You even bring report after report that life come from non life and then you have the audacity to say that you do not make claims?
How can be so so stupid.  

---

Rik has not evolved, that is the problem.  He has this pre-conceived notion of evolution that simply does not fit the facts.

Well, well, well.......

Here we got one more fool that wish to try his luck.

Let us see about these facts.
Where is the evidence that man pop up as per magic without first evolve from matter, plants, and animals as atheists claim?

---

Rik has not evolved, that is the problem.  He has this pre-conceived notion of evolution that simply does not fit the facts.

Shush!
The dense cunt has no idea the troll is being trolled. Jörmungandr and others are doing some sterling work keeping the twat tied down here least he wonder off to poison other sites.

Keep them off the streets.

The dense FOOL has no idea the troll is being trolled.  

In fact the reality lead that way as yog can not even bring any solid evidence that life can come from non life.  
The poor thing try again and again but the war for her has already been lost.
AMEN.  

---

"Density" and "cunts" are a materialist dogma.  LR is stuck here getting shit on because he deserves it.  It's his karma.

Sure, sure Khem.  
Whatever BS you say.  
In the meantime can you please help your friend yog to explain how life can come from non life?