Parody thread: Not trolling "Why The Vision Argument Is A Very Shite One"
April 21, 2018 at 2:03 pm
Premise 1: We have eyes and see.
Premise 2: Vision can mean like a vision into another world. I take LSD and "have a vision".
Premise 3: A magical visionyness requires a magical giant wizardy person with magic powers for vision. Let's call him God.
Premise 4: Whoops this is supposed to be the conclusion.
Conclusion: Magicy wizard God exists because it's required for eyesight to believe in God.
I iz coherent.
Second argument built into the same post even though this is supposed to be about vision and not values:
Premise 1: Values happen we value stuff.
Premise 2: Obviously we value stuff with our brains and actions but let's pretend that means there is a super value like ultimate special value meaning of life.
Premise: Can't have this without a magic man to control it all. This is also the conclusion.
End.
The darkness, the darkness, ramble ramble, the darkness. It is skerry and deceives.
Real end.
Premise 2: Vision can mean like a vision into another world. I take LSD and "have a vision".
Premise 3: A magical visionyness requires a magical giant wizardy person with magic powers for vision. Let's call him God.
Premise 4: Whoops this is supposed to be the conclusion.
Conclusion: Magicy wizard God exists because it's required for eyesight to believe in God.
I iz coherent.
Second argument built into the same post even though this is supposed to be about vision and not values:
Premise 1: Values happen we value stuff.
Premise 2: Obviously we value stuff with our brains and actions but let's pretend that means there is a super value like ultimate special value meaning of life.
Premise: Can't have this without a magic man to control it all. This is also the conclusion.
End.
The darkness, the darkness, ramble ramble, the darkness. It is skerry and deceives.
Real end.
