Evolution

[Angrboda]

Why Einstein should say that the vibrations are alive?
It would be a stupid statement.
It would be like saying that the water is wet.
It is obvious that the vibrations are alive.

You're still contradicting yourself about the obviousness of life in matter.  If Einstein never said anything about it, why did you bring him up as an example of how I was contradicting science?

To see life in a rock is not easy that is why we can say that is not possible to see life in matter but life is there anyway.
Certain minerals like uranium release energy and energy-consciousness are the two sides of the same sheet so matter is not dead therefore the vibrations that compose the matter are alive.

Using one bit of unsupported Ananda Marga dogma to support another unsupported bit of dogma gets you nowhere.  You're just running in place.  What reason do you have for believing that wherever there is energy, there is consciousness?  If you have no reason, then energy and consciousness aren't two sides of the same sheet.  I think this is an overly simplistic understanding of what Sarkar said, anyway.  His claim was that consciousness implied the existence of a suitable prakrti in each case observed.  Is a suitable prakrti observed in radioactive matter?  No.  Radioactive matter decays in rigidly fixed patterns, unlike the way things we know have consciousness behaves.  Simply equating energy and consciousness is little more than begging the question.  (See Ananda Marga Elementary Philosophy, Ch. 1, What Is Dharma?)

Going up and up in the evolution scale the more there is evolution the more there are visible evidence that vibrations are alive.

Such as?

We humans are alive and we are made of vibrations.
As we come from previous life and this previous life goes back to pure matter then the evidence that life come from life is more than evident.
Only stubborn idiots believe otherwise.    

You're putting the cart before the horse.  Until you can demonstrate that vibrations are alive, there is no point in talking about what goes back to pure matter.  

Now let us talk about Abiogenesis.

It say.............the original evolution of life or living organisms from inorganic or inanimate substances........or..........is the natural process by which life arises from non-living matter, such as simple organic compounds............

Fool like you think that inanimate substances or organic compounds have no life in them but they do as has already been demonstrated.

You haven't demonstrated jack shit, douchebag.

Uranium is an inanimate substance yet there life in it.

Pure bollocks.  Tell me which of the following events carries the signature of life?