Views beyond Atheism

[Edwardo Piet]

Books are no more evidence of God than the Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster is evidence of his noodliness the holy FSM tho....

Bollocks

Depends if you like shit for reasoning or reasoning :p

---

I know of no MORE evidence of valid reasoning for God's actual EXISTENCE than the FSM. Why should I give "God" special treatment? The Bible is not evidence or remotely valid reasons for God's existence just as the Gospel of the FSM isn't for the FSM.

Your response is simply a bare assertion that it's "bollocks" what I said and that it depends if I like "shit for reasoning" or "reasoning"...

Well - I have explained that I know of no more evidence or valid reasons to believe God or the Bible should be treated any differently to the FSM or the FSM Gospel. All these things I require evidence for and I don't know of any reasons whatsoever of why the bible (or other books about God that contain this 'reasoning') should be treated any different to the FSM Gospel - why should I treat it any differently?

See my sig, I haven't got the time. There are a MILLION things that I can't disprove that there's no evidence of! I can't check them ALL out - so why should I give some special treatment? It's all bollocks until I know of any actual evidence whatsoever.

Your bare assertions mean nothing. The Bible is not evidence (or remotely valid reasoning for God's existence) for EXACTLY the same reason that the FSM Gospel isn't. I know of no evidence (or valid reasoning ) to believe otherwise. Why should I?

Amount of evidence/valid reasoning for existence for God: ZERO.

Amount of evidence/valid reasoning for existence for The Flying Spaghetti Monster: ZERO.

Amount of known evidence/valid reasoning to give God special treatment: ZERO.




EvF