Evolution

[Little Rik]

Einstein said that everything is vibration.

Vibrations move, they are energetic, vigorous, vibrant, sparkling and full of life so they are not dead.
The other option is that they are dead but have you ever seen something dead that does the above actions?

If vibrations are not in fact alive, then yes, I've seen many vibrating dead things as all things are then essentially dead.  Besides begging the question, this again doesn't differentiate between the Yoga view that the vibrations are alive and the Christian view that God is alive and He is making the vibrations do what they do.  In order for your view of evolution to hold, you need to be able to distinguish the former from the latter.  Stringing together a bunch of adjectives that might describe vibrations doesn't do it.  As can be seen in the vibrations that are water waves, which are caused by an application of an exterior force, wind, it's possible that the vibrations are an effect of the interaction of otherwise constant forces, as in how a window shudders in the wind.  In that case, vibrations would vibrate because of the interaction between potential vibrators, not because of anything internal to the vibrations themselves.  So, no, this only shows that you, once again, are the fool.

1) Within this universe wherever there is a body there is a mind-consciousness.
It doesn't really matter whether this body is a human body or a rock (matter).
Consciousness and body always go hand in hand.

Dog... ma.....

Outside this universe as has already been demonstrated by thousand of NDEs consciousness does not need a body but within this universe it does.

Since you declined to answer the clairvoyance objection, that makes your claim here false.

2) Radioactive matter can not in any way be compared to higher type of conscious life.
It is natural that a very low type of consciousness such as the one in the matter or radioactive matter in this case will act in a total different way and have different way of react.

If it can't be compared, then why are you comparing it to that?  You're filled with contradictions.  You're claiming now that radioactivity doesn't behave like the life of conscious things, therefore it is like the life of conscious things!  You make no sense.

There is a parallelism between vibrations and state of awareness so the movement and the sparkling life within a human body can not be the same as the one found in matter.   In matter the vibrations reflect the state in which this matter lie which is a latent-inactive-dormant stage.  

You claimed that more evidence of life was available the higher up the evolutionary scale you go.  Besides not answering the question put to you, this is just more irrelevant twaddle.

See above above but most of all wake up and grow up.  

Yes, I did by showing that there is life in matter such as uranium.  

Like I said, you didn't demonstrate jack shit.  Not only do you claim that the behavior which indicates life in uranium is different from the behavior that indicates life in things we know possess it, thus leaving you without a valid point, your claim that uranium was alive was based on unsupported dogma about some equivalence between the presence of energy and the presence of consciousness.  Supporting one bit of dogma with another bit of dogma gets you nowhere.  You're just arguing in a circle.

You want evidence?
Go to Hiroshima and ask the survival of the bomb whether there was life or not in the explosion.

More irrelevant twaddle.  What in fuck are you trying to say here?  The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki did not demonstrate that uranium was "alive."

FOUR TIME FOOL.

One of the worse dogma that atheists believe is that there is separation everywhere.
So according to atheists consciousness in plants will never turn into animals, animals into humans and humans into God.  
NDEs already tell us that we are all interconnected and everything vibrate.
Vibrations vary in strength according the level of awareness that we all have that however doesn't mean that vibrations are dead.
How can something that keep us alive can be dead?

Even your demented idea that vibrations are not alive because they can be caused by an application of an exterior force it is but a foolish idea.
An application of an exterior force is energy that turn into vibrations and energy is vibrations.
What is the difference between vibrations and energy?
Nothing really.
It is the same thing so an application of exterior force into a visible vibration does not in any way show that vibrations are not alive.
Science say that is not possible to get rid of energy.
Energy only change in effect but it never lose her power and because energy is alive also vibrations are alive.

Bombs are made of energy and because energy is made of vibrations my referring to Hiroshima was a clear example of vibrations.


Fail again.

---

Lol still no evidence vibrations are living things and no evidence that the vibration need an outside source accept by false analogy  . And NDE don't prove shit.

Wrong once again Tiz.     

NDEs prove everything BECAUSE science tell us that there is no hallucinations involved and death is real.
Under such a conditions it can not be deny that what is experienced by these people is not real.