(April 27, 2018 at 2:09 pm)Hammy Wrote:(April 27, 2018 at 7:05 am)alpha male Wrote: OK, you're merely dressing up materialism.
That's not an an argument.
Sure it is. You said previously, "You're literally believing in something that there can't possibly be any evidence of." We've now seen that you base this on a priori materialism.
Quote:This doesn't apply to things outside the natural world. He's talking about science in case you didn't notice.
And his point is that whereas there can be evidence from other theories... falsifaiblity is the best approach and this is why it is now the standard of science. Other forms of evidence are not considered scientific anymore... that was my point there.
If you want to claim that the evidence you have is unfalsifable and unscientific still weak evidence then that's one thing... but to claim that it's evidence of something outside the natural world is another. It can't be. There is no theory of science that addresses things outside the natural world. You know this so your point is simply a red herring.
More materialism. Nothing more.