Evolution

[DLJ]

...
1) Evolution.

There is nothing wrong with Darwin study.
The guy did what he could in order to understand CHANGES within the physical aspect of lower form of life such as plants and animals.
That is where his studies end.
All he understood is that these changes are trigger by survival only.
It never pop up in his mind that there is a force that guide all life in the universe and that force also guide plants and animals to go on and on towards progress.
Evolution is progress in consciousness not just a change in bodies that is why Darwin study is very very limited in understanding what real evolution is all about.
...

Y'know what? I could get on board with some of that... if using some very loose definitions.

To clarify, could you please give the definitions you are using for:
1. "lower" - what is the criteria for higher or lower forms of life given that any and every species existing today has had the same amount of time to evolve?
2. "guide"
3. "progress" - is this meant in the sense of advancing to some goal or merely in the sense of moving onward?
4. "consciousness"

Thanks.