(May 5, 2018 at 10:22 pm)CDF47 Wrote:(May 5, 2018 at 10:13 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: Uh, no
The debate you imagined isn’t over because it could never start.
There could never be any debate involving your cult. With you there is only a echo chamber of calculating hucksters and gullible wish thinking fools affirming an infantile preconceived notion because your cult threaten you with hellfire and load you with Unscrupulous guilt trip if you don’t.
The serious debate could never involve the likes of your kind. Amongst serious scientists the debate has been over for a hundred years. There is neither evidence nor need for design. Natural elements sufficient to convince of their adequacy is readily to be found for each and every step needed from prelude to life to you.
So take your head out of sand made from jesus capolite.
The scientific community disagrees with you. 51 percent of scientists are believers and 41 percent are non-believers based on a Pew poll result. Once the stigma of ID wears old, I expect that number to increase even more for believers. Also, 89 percent of people in the US believe in God based on a Gallup poll.
http://www.pewforum.org/2009/11/05/scien...nd-belief/
http://news.gallup.com/poll/193271/ameri...e-god.aspx
That really depends on how you define scientist, and from those whom you define as scientist, who exactly do you pick, doesn’t it?
Suffice it to say overwhelming percentage of PRACTICING BIOLOGISTS can’t even be bothered to give the time to those who would argue as you do.
Earlier in this thread, that has already been pointed out to you. But like any christard, you cling to whatever seem to you to support your preconceived notion, totally disregarding the most obvious flaws emphatically pointed out to you.