Evolution

[Little Rik]

If you have to almost write a book in order to say............THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO SUGGEST THAT VIBRATIONS ARE ALIVE .......then some nuts are clearly missing in your brain.  

You exist because you parents were alive and so animals, plants and matter.

Parents, check.  Animals, check.  Plants, check.  Matter?  I understand this is what you believe, but you haven't given any justification for believing that it's true.  Until you do, it's just religious dogma, and I don't give a shit about your religious dogma.

Science is on my side yog.
Nothing has ever sprung out of nothing.
This is science.

Since the question has nothing to do with whether nothing can come from nothing, this is just more irrelevant tripe.   The question is whether you have justification for believing that vibrations and energy are alive, or that life only comes from life.  You keep claiming that science is on your side, yet you so far have been unable to provide one scientific fact supporting you.  You obviously have a strange idea of what it means for science to be on your side.

I do not contradict science.

Science has neither proved nor disproved the hypothesis that life can come from non-life.  As long as you claim that you know that life cannot come from non-life, you are definitely diverging from science.

You clearly object the very science that you say you believe in so you fail not me.  

I challenged you once before to show where I contradicted science when you claimed this, and you ran away like a little girl.  Are you going to back up your statement and show where I contradict science, or will you run away yet again?

It appears that you chose to shut up, rather than put up.  If you can't provide justification for believing that the Christian view is wrong, then you obviously don't have any such reasons. ... Either you have reasons to reject the Christian theory or you don't.  If you don't, your belief that vibrations/energy are alive is just dogma.

I see you chose not to respond.  I guess that means you can't disprove the Christian view.  That means your belief is just dogma.  You fail again.

1) My previous answers to your questions were pretty clear.
Even a school kid would have understood that vibrations are alive considering that they bring life and life can only come from life.
Why science should tell that vibrations are alive?
It would be like to say that the water is wet.
Why scientists should engage in such stupid comments?
Unfortunately you must have some nuts in your brain not working so you keep on repeating the same questions again and again.

You will have to get some private tuition in the hope that the knowledge finally enter your brain.
I am always willing to help people in need provide that they are willing to learn.
You do not qualify in this regard.

2) Disprove Christian view?

Here we go again.
Why should  waste my time disproving dogmas?
I tried in a Christian forum with the result that they kick me out after one week.

The original message from Jesus unfortunately is long gone so now they are left with twisted and false truth.  

But let us see your question.
You say..........the Christian view that a god external to them is causing them to behave as they do.......blah, blah, blah.......

Not all Christians think like this.
Many Christians also believe in free will so they understand that bad actions may cause them to end down in their invented hell.

Have you got any more stupid questions to ask?

---

snip for brevity

You have not addressed the point at hand. I am deeply offended by you. You must thus bear the burden of that karma. Or does your offensive "get out of jail" card work there too?

---

And now in detail

I do accept what he did in the same way that I would accept the work that a schoolboy would be able to do with his mental capacity.
Obviously this means that what the schoolboy knows is quite limited compared to what there is out there to learn.  

You also moronically assume that science simply stopped at that point 150 years ago, That is a stupid idea.

I am commenting about Darwin not about today science but even today science hasn't still got the idea that consciousness expansion is the main reason in evolution.  

There is no such thing as "lower" and "higher" forms of life. Such distinctions are arbitrary human-made distinctions of little value.

Are you telling me that the awareness in consciousness that you got is the same as the one that a donkey have?
Get real Aba.  

No. Learn to read.

One day the donkey will progress to become a human being too but at the moment that is not the case that is why we say higher or lower form of life.  

Would that be a talking donkey?

The body will rot away but the consciousness will live for ever in a suitable new body that match that consciousness.
A pity that atheism is still floating in the mental stone age that doesn't get that everything move and change overtime.  

Not wrong at all Aba.
Obviously Darwin at that stage in life was not interested in understanding the main factor that trigger evolution.
To him the main interest was the physical factor such as survival.

It's the 21st century, not the 19th. You are two centuries out of date. Quit living in the Victorian era.
Try to learn new things. It's only been a couple of centuries.

Wake up Aba.  
We are talking about Darwin not about today science.

All he understood is that these changes are trigger by survival only.

Nope. Wrong again. And now I have lost the will.

Frankly, your crankery holds no water, and you have offended me. What restitution do you propose? No, don't bother. There is no restitution you could offer which would remotely make up for your sin.

---

And you still reside in the delusion that whatever you post on the internet is not real. Well it is. Folks have committed suicide in real life because of cockwomles like YOU. So yes, you are actually perpetrating actual harm. You may not realise it but you are actively doing it.