Big Bang theory is not valid.

[popeyespappy]

What did you expect? You storm in here proclaiming that you are going to show everyone one of the most popular theories in cosmology is fatally flawed and assert you can show that dark matter doesn’t exist. Instead of doing what you said you spend most of your time bragging about your connections and getting into pissing contests. You propose modified gravity laws as an alternative to dark matter without any discussion about them. Then you post a link to an article discussing an exciting new observation with no relevance to dark matter and claim it proves dark matter doesn’t exist. I still don’t know if you understand that the existence of an alternative explanation doesn’t really prove anything, or that the paper about the filaments simply confirmed the existence of visible matter predicted not only by the long abandoned plasma theory but also by the Big Bang model.

I suspect you wanted to talk about the things covered in Wun-Yi Shu’s paper Cosmological Models with No Big Bang. If so let’s do it. The main points of Shu’s model; 1) the speed of light and the gravitational "constant" are not constant, but vary with the evolution of the universe, 2) time has no beginning and no end, 3) the spatial section of the universe is a 3-sphere, and 4) the universe experiences phases of both acceleration and deceleration. These things are worthy of discussion even though at this point in time they fall well short of replacing the Big Bang as the most popular model for the origin of the universe.