Astreja: The OP, and this whole thread, appear to be one massive tu quoque fallacy:
YB: that takes the form
A claims X.
B claims A's claims inconsistent with the truth of claim X.
Therefore X is false.
This form is:
If X is true, then X is supported by L (a logical rational reason)
X is not supported by L
So X is not true
YB: that takes the form
A claims X.
B claims A's claims inconsistent with the truth of claim X.
Therefore X is false.
This form is:
If X is true, then X is supported by L (a logical rational reason)
X is not supported by L
So X is not true