Ybe an atheist

[Ybe]

Astreja: The OP, and this whole thread, appear to be one massive tu quoque fallacy:

YB: that takes the form:   
   A  claims X.
   B claims  A's claims  inconsistent with the truth of claim X.
   Therefore X is false.

That falls apart immediately because I reject B's claim.
A claims "I do not believe in gods."
B, who almost certainly does not possess the ability to read A's mind, has no way of falsifying A's claim and is just being an asshole when claiming that A's statement is false.

That which I bolded above represents  tu quoque fallacy, which I am not using. (See below for my form):

If X true, then X is supported by L (a logical rational reason)
X is not supported by L
So X is not true
Ex.
If atheist Astreja's belief is logical, then that her belief will be  supported by  L
Astreja claims she has no L (rational excuse for her belief)
therefore her belief is not logical.