(May 26, 2018 at 11:21 am)Ybe Wrote:And I'm trying to fill in blanks(May 26, 2018 at 8:52 am)robvalue Wrote: I told you I'm not going to define all the words I use. You won't even define one word, "God", the point of the whole discussion. I don't think you really need all those words explained.The discussion is about I mean is about the Q is there any logical. reasonable. rational reason to be an A.
And I'm trying to fill in blanks
A: My logical rational reason for being an A is_____________________________.
And that is supported by the logical rational reason of ________________________.
From:
I'm nominally an atheist because every definition of God I've heard of consists of one or more of the following:
1) Incoherent RV: - lacking any useful meaning, or so vague as to provide no substance.
2) Untestable
3) Relabelling
And that is supported by the logical rational reason of "When confirmed and verified proof is presented,".
I want to make sure your of your logical reason for being a n A and according to you in the above; definitions being vague or incoherent somehow have something to do with your logical reason for being an A. It is confusing. I don't like confusion. Perhaps you could make a succinct statement that fills in the blanks above and I will go from there.
For example:
My logical reason for being an A is,
I am certain about my belief
and that is supported by,
I know no I have no incoherent non vague definitions are
thoroughly tested my being an A by __________
Keep things labeled as they are.
A: My logical rational reason for being an A is there is no evidence for ANY of the thousands of claimed "gods". Not one.
And that is supported by the logical rational reason of there is no evidence for ANY of the thousands of claimed "gods". Not one.