(May 26, 2018 at 7:55 am)downbeatplumb Wrote:(May 25, 2018 at 3:04 pm)Ybe Wrote:(May 25, 2018 at 12:42 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: As far as I can tell there is no god, therefore I do not believe in the existence of god.
The irrational thing would be to have no reason to believe in something and believe it anyway.
(May 25, 2018 at 3:04 pm)Ybe Wrote: "As far as you can tell" is your logical, reasonable, rational, reason to be an A.... right....
(May 25, 2018 at 3:04 pm)Ybe Wrote: ... "as far as I can tell no logical rational reasonable reason to be an A exists."... no...YbeI edit out the verbiage to help me to filter to your answers.
... agree... rational logical reason to not be an A?
(Just to be clear in the Q Is there any logical. reasonable. rational reason to be an A your answer is):
A: My logical rational reason for being an A is_____________________________.
" As far as I can tell there is no god",
And that is supported by the logical rational reason of ________________________.
therefore I do not believe in the existence of god.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DPB: "The irrational thing would be to have no reason to believe in something and believe it anyway".
YB: This is my Q. in the belief of being an A, what is the reason to hold on to that belief?
If I said, "as far as I can tell" you are a theist (that being my reason)
and then said, "therefore I do not believe" you are an atheist".
Should that allow me to say I find the idea reason for being an (A) a stupid a kids answer to hard questions.
(Not trying to be harsh, just critiquing the logical reason you seem to have given ).
