(May 26, 2018 at 12:08 pm)Ybe Wrote:
(Just to be clear in the Q Is there any logical. reasonable. rational reason to be an A your answer is):
A: My logical rational reason for being an A is_____________________________.
" As far as I can tell there is no god",
And that is supported by the logical rational reason of ________________________.
therefore I do not believe in the existence of god.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DPB: "The irrational thing would be to have no reason to believe in something and believe it anyway".
YB: This is my Q. in the belief of being an A, what is the reason to hold on to that belief?
If I said, "as far as I can tell" you are a theist (that being my reason)
and then said, "therefore I do not believe" you are an atheist".
Should that allow me to say I find the idea reason for being an (A) a stupid a kids answer to hard questions.
(Not trying to be harsh, just critiquing the logical reason you seem to have given ).
English isn't your first language is it. It is very hard to comprehend the virtual gibberish you are spouting.
But let me summarise what you are saying.
I say that I find no arguments for evidence presented so far sufficient to sway me from my belief that the idea of god does not meet my standard of evidence for being a real thing and sway me from my opinion that it is just the go to answer for the feeble minded.
But you say that not being convinced of somethings existence is not a good enough reason to NOT believe in it.
That position means that you must believe any premise no matter how silly or contradictory to any other belief you may hold or be a total hypocrite.
At this point you are just being annoying and I suspect that's the point.

You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.