Ybe an atheist

[Ybe]

    
 logical rational reason for being an A is_____________________________.
                                                                  " As far as I can tell there is no god",

And that is supported by the logical rational reason of ________________________.
                                                                                 therefore I do not believe in the existence of god.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I find no arguments for evidence presented so far sufficient to sway me from my belief that the idea of god does not meet my standard of evidence for being a real thing and sway me from my opinion

But you say that  not being convinced of somethings existence is not a good enough reason to NOT believe in it.

That position means that you must believe any premise no matter how silly or contradictory to any other belief you may hold or be a total hypocrite.

I am not saying that it could be a logical reason in. But I'm taking an A view and trying to get what logical supports it . Think OK here is a fellow A. Hes trying to give logical reasonable reason to support under-gird the statement.

"I find no arguments for evidence presented so far sufficient to sway  me from my belief that the idea of god does not meet my standard of evidence for being a real thing and sway me from my opinion"

To show that it is something more than just an assertion.  And when I ask for help  how to support that  reason they repeat what the assertion varying the words. Except for Mr. A.
----------------------------------------------

Abaddon_ire
A: My logical rational reason for being an A is there is no evidence for ANY of the thousands of claimed "gods". Not one.
And that is supported by the logical rational reason of there is no evidence for ANY of the thousands of claimed "gods". Not one.
----------------------------------------------------
So, if the logical support for being an A is    No E
supported by the logical rational reason of No E

It would allow theists to claim logical support for believing G is
as long as they support it with the logical rational reason that G is .

But if that is all it take to support a reason by As, then A's  have sufficient  E to become a theist.

---

drfuzzy Wrote: You have a REAL problem with logic.

YB: This is so Ironic.
IRONIC happening in the opposite way to what is expected, and typically causing wry amusement because of this.

---

The  discussion is about I mean is about the Q is there any  logical. reasonable. rational reason to be an A.

And  I'm trying to fill in blanks
A: My logical rational reason for being an A is_____________________________.
And that is supported by the logical rational reason of ________________________.

From:
I'm nominally an atheist because every definition of God I've heard of consists of one or more of the following:
1) Incoherent RV: - lacking any useful meaning, or so vague as to provide no substance.
2) Untestable
3) Relabelling
And that is supported by the logical rational reason of "When confirmed and verified proof is presented,".

I want to make sure your of your logical reason for being a n A  and according to you in the above; definitions being vague or incoherent somehow have something to do with your logical reason for being an A. It is confusing. I don't like confusion. Perhaps you could make a succinct statement that fills in the blanks above and I will go from there.
For example:
 My logical reason for being an A is,
           I am certain about my belief
 and that is supported by,
       I know no I have no  incoherent non vague definitions are
       thoroughly tested my being an A by __________
        Keep things labeled as they are.

And  I'm trying to fill in blanks 
A: My logical rational reason for being an A is there is no evidence for ANY of the thousands of claimed "gods". Not one.
And that is supported by the logical rational reason of there is no evidence for ANY of the thousands of claimed "gods". Not one.

That is that something you believe though, right?   You do believe atheism to be a lack of belief in G?

If that's not what you believe, then that would turn in to:
 I don't believe that atheism is a lack of belief in G?

No, atheism is a lack of a belief in any deity by DEFINITION. That is what the word means, no more no less.

You can't simply show up and arbitrarily redefine common words to suit whatever crank agenda you might have.

If that were to be the case, we could redefine "theist" to mean "deluded crackpot" and "christian" to mean "moronic liar".

Surely you can understand that such stupid ad-hoc redefinitions would be utterly bovine and meaningless.

In actual fact, simply being an atheist tells you one thing and one thing only. That the person does not believe in any deity. That is all.

It tells you exactly nothing at all about any other beliefs they may or may not hold. 

I realise that your desperately and fervently wish that there were some "atheist dogma" or "atheist priesthood" or "atheist belief". However, you feverishly making such things up out of whole cloth does not  somehow magically make them real.

Facts are stubborn things.