(May 26, 2018 at 4:41 pm)Ybe Wrote:OK, you seem to labour under the misunderstanding that if you sufficiently bork quotes that nobody can work it out. Guess again.(May 26, 2018 at 11:39 am)Abaddon_ire Wrote: Abaddon_ire[/b]So, if the logical support for being an A is No E
A: My logical rational reason for being an A is there is no evidence for ANY of the thousands of claimed "gods". Not one.
And that is supported by the logical rational reason of there is no evidence for ANY of the thousands of claimed "gods". Not one.
supported by the logical rational reason of No E
It would allow theists to claim logical support for believing G is
as long as they support it with the logical rational reason that G is .
But if that is all it take to support a reason by As, then A's have sufficient E to become a theist.
As a programmer, it is trivial to unpick you attempt to bork tags. It is simply another example of your fundamental dishonesty. As is your use of 4337 5p33k. It is a lie, and as one steeped in actual 4337 5p33k, you are what we refer to as a pretender.
In any event if you have evidence for your particular deity of choice, then you should present it. You would be the first in thousands of years to do so. Nobody else ever has.
Perhaps you are that special.
As things stand, no evidence for any god has been seen. There things rest.