RE: Ybe an atheist
May 27, 2018 at 6:31 pm
(This post was last modified: May 27, 2018 at 6:33 pm by Ybe.)
(May 27, 2018 at 1:30 pm)drfuzzy Wrote: Chop chop troll. Scientific proof. You have presented nothing but your whiny idiotic circular non-logical idiocy so far.
I have only regurgitated A(s) circular reasons.
You need to start a thread that asks for evidence, if that is what you wish.
But first would you explain with a logical reasonable reason (that won't end up being circular,as you said) that will evidence to me that you reallly have a good logcial reason for being an A?
(May 27, 2018 at 6:17 pm)Brian37 Wrote:(May 27, 2018 at 12:04 pm)Ybe Wrote: The burden of proof for this thread is for As to give a logical rational reason for being what they claim to be.
I remain unconvinced by the E given as logical rational reason to be what they claim to be.
Also, applying the logic given by an A (italics):
I am an A because No E Vs I am a T because G is
supported by No E supported by G is
If G is then A is False
G Is (as shown)
So Aism false
Now I am not saying the A logic is sound but if it is their logic then applying it G is and now they do have E
I cant accept the bellow A type reasoning:
If one has a lack of belief in G, then he is an A
I lack belief in G
I am an A
Oops Not very convincing 1. No proof of belief being lacked .
If I'm an A, then no E for G
no E for G
I'm an A
Oops how do you know you are able to know E or no E. What do you depend on to know you've analyzed E properly?
That was a waste of server space and my brain hurts just reading this nonsense.
Really? I just refined what A's have been giving me so far. Great to know you know how I feel.