Ybe an atheist

[Ybe]

The logical conclusion here is that he either doesn't know what a God is, or he's too embarrassed to say because he knows how stupid it will sound.

Either way, this fits comfortably into my "don't care" category. This is truly pathetic, trying to show there's something wrong with someone's thinking regarding a topic that hasn't even been given yet. Examining scepticism in general is one thing, but pretending this has anything to do with atheism is laughable.

---

PS: at least start off with a sensible, well-defined question to discuss, such as:

"Was our environment designed by an intelligence?"

The reason I focus on this Q. (What is your logical rational reason for being an A) is:
If an A (or -A) base their position on a obscured view, then why discuss what they see.

By way of analogy:
Hill dweller yells down to a valley dweller, "the damn broke get up to higher ground".
The valley guy says, "need some evidence first .
Hill guy says, "You can't see clearly from there. Come on up and we will discuss  evidence".

Not exact, but close enough for now.

---

God=Magic. God's follower=almost slave. I'm not interested in slavery and Magic.

A=Faulty logic.  A Assertions =  un justified reasons.

---

... clarification. If you would like to participate great:
 >  Arguments should be relevant to what is being asked (see first post) and the relevance should be shown.
 >  Justify your  statements    (arguments, so far were assertions) . So justify them ask yourself,  and then say why your assertion true?
 >  Validity should also be included, any logical reason should have premises that logically produce the conclusion as the only possible   
      conclusion.
Hope you are able to  participate.

---

If I assert something, without support, you are welcome to consider if you think there is or isn't support or else take it as opinion.

people claim a god a god exists, I don't see any evidence that a god exists therefore I don't believe the claim. It the same logical position that you would take with any extraordinary claim at face value. If I asked you to provide a logical reason for not believing in leprechauns what would you say?People claim a lot of things like they are atheists.

If G exists, then A claims are extraordinary.
and I would need to have a rational reason for why they are an A.

Then I would know they are capable to reason about believing or not believing  leprechauns.
 (Assuming you mean =  leprechaun -  Irish folklore of an imaginary creature that looks like a little old man.

---

Ambiguous.

Merciful G must exist  as there are multiple G(s) around sounds like a logical reason to me. Your not going to tell me G isn't merciful.  
(this is just for example, only ).

Not ambiguous. It states it specifically in the bible, more than once. How do you find this merciful? 

And did you say multiple gods? Demonstrated in the bible? 

Your turn to demonstrate your logical reason regarding child killing and now multiple biblical gods.

 ambiguous

1. (of language) open to more than one interpretation; having a double meaning.
   "the question is rather ambiguous"
   
   • unclear or inexact because a choice between alternatives has not been made.
     "this whole society is morally ambiguous"
     synonyms:
     equivocal, ambivalent, open to debate/argument, arguable, debatable; More
     obscure, unclear, imprecise, vague, abstruse, doubtful, dubious, uncertain
     "an ambiguous explanation
     Ref. https://www.google.com/search?q=ambiguou...=firefox-a

You need to show how your
 >  argument is relevant
 >  Justify your  statements  ask yourself why your assertion is true?
 >  Validity should also be included, logical reasons should have premises  that produce the conclusion to bethe only possible conclusion.  (so it isn't ambiguous)...

---

See post for #261  for what is considered good.

I understand not everyone will be willing to participate.

I keep hearing a lot of hype sometimes provocative from As that Ts  are irrational. so I'm here to see if they really no what is rational.

And I provided you with my answer. An answer that you applauded and promised faithfully to address.

But you failed miserably to do so.

Was that another "lie for jebus"?

Or are you fundamentally a liar regardless?