(May 28, 2018 at 2:58 pm)Ybe Wrote:Dunno. So far you appear to be an abject liar. I can only go by what I observe.(May 28, 2018 at 5:29 am)robvalue Wrote: The logical conclusion here is that he either doesn't know what a God is, or he's too embarrassed to say because he knows how stupid it will sound.
Either way, this fits comfortably into my "don't care" category. This is truly pathetic, trying to show there's something wrong with someone's thinking regarding a topic that hasn't even been given yet. Examining scepticism in general is one thing, but pretending this has anything to do with atheism is laughable.
PS: at least start off with a sensible, well-defined question to discuss, such as:
"Was our environment designed by an intelligence?"
The reason I focus on this Q. (What is your logical rational reason for being an A) is:
If an A (or -A) base their position on a obscured view, then why discuss what they see.
By way of analogy:
Hill dweller yells down to a valley dweller, "the damn broke get up to higher ground".
The valley guy says, "need some evidence first .
Hill guy says, "You can't see clearly from there. Come on up and we will discuss evidence".
Not exact, but close enough for now.
(May 28, 2018 at 6:29 am)purplepurpose Wrote: God=Magic. God's follower=almost slave. I'm not interested in slavery and Magic.A=Faulty logic. A Assertions = un justified reasons.
(May 28, 2018 at 7:17 am)Mr.wizard Wrote: people claim a god a god exists, I don't see any evidence that a god exists therefore I don't believe the claim. It the same logical position that you would take with any extraordinary claim at face value. If I asked you to provide a logical reason for not believing in leprechauns what would you say?People claim a lot of things like they are atheists.If G exists, then A claims are extraordinary.
and I would need to have a rational reason for why they are an A.
Then I would know they are capable to reason about believing or not believing leprechauns.
(Assuming you mean = leprechaun - Irish folklore of an imaginary creature that looks like a little old man.
Want to convince me otherwise? Have at it.
So far you appear to be a dishonest religious scumbag. You could prove me wrong, of course, but I suspect you will not.