Ybe an atheist

[Ybe]

See post for #261  for what is considered good.
I understand not everyone will be willing to participate.
I keep hearing a lot of hype sometimes provocative from As that Ts  are irrational. so I'm here to see if they really no what is rational.

And I provided you with my answer. An answer that you applauded and promised faithfully to address.
But you failed miserably to do so.
Was that another "lie for jebus"?
Or are you fundamentally a liar regardless?

I tried to make a post last night. I pressed enter and poof it was gone. I spent some time so I was a little frustrated. This will be a test and I will try again next post.

---

Something didn't seem right, but I will try this one. 

Want to convince me otherwise? Have at it.

you said:
Abaddon_ire
A: My logical rational reason for being an A is there is no evidence for ANY of the thousands of claimed "gods". Not one.
And that is supported by the logical rational reason of there is no evidence for ANY of the thousands of claimed "gods". Not one.
----------------------------------------------------
I have since posted:

.. clarification. If you would like to participate great:
 >  Arguments should be relevant to what is being asked (see first post) and the relevance should be shown.
 >  Justify your  statements    (arguments, so far were assertions) . So justify them ask yourself,  and then say why your assertion true?
 >  Validity should also be included, any logical reason should have premises that logically produce the conclusion as the only possible   
      conclusion.
If you would like to rephrase your reason according to the above clarification it would be better.

I will put your hypothesis into an argument for you (as clarification was given after your post):
 If is no E then no G
 No E
 So No G

Argument to refute  the above:

If A knows (no E for G), then A knows (all E)
A doesn't know all E
So, A doesn't know (no E for G)

If you think my formulation for your argument is inaccurate please post your own with my apologies.


If A can't present a logical reason (as in above clarification), then his assertion will be considered an opinion.
without logical support.

---

The problem here is you think I'm trying to prove G.  I am not.

Yeah, actually you are. Even if you don't realize it, you are trying to prove a god.

Proving that an A has no logical rational reason for being an A only proves an A needs to examine his rationality. How do you think that proves G.