RE: Ybe an atheist
May 28, 2018 at 8:24 pm
(This post was last modified: May 28, 2018 at 8:35 pm by brewer.)
(May 28, 2018 at 8:10 pm)Ybe Wrote:(May 28, 2018 at 7:00 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: In the OP you used biblical versus as your rational justification for belief in your god. Therefore, biblical passages are open to discussion.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why are you refusing to address my rational logical and valid reason for not believing in your god who directs the killing of children?
Define "necessary conclusion".
It is a true premise that the bible/your god indicates that children can be killed.
Is this you dodging again?
"multiple gods", an assertion 8). This is not a bible passage so you should be able to address it in this thread. Please tell us about your multiple gods.
G = (What many A's say they have no belief in). My G is the G found in the B"
- JOH 4:24 God [is] a Spirit.
- ACS 17:28 For in him we live, and move, and have our being;
- 1TI 1:17 ...the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only wise God
- JOH 1:3 All things were made by him..
- REV 4:8...Holy, holy, holy, Lord God Almighty, which was, and is, and is to come.
- PSA 115:3 ...he hath done whatsoever he hath pleased.
- PSA 44:6 ...beside me [there is] no God. (see Bible for details)
B= Bible (My G's book)
A = Atheism, belief in the absence of any belief in G; "One who does not believe in G" is an A.
Belief= an acceptance that a statement is true or that something exists. "his belief in the value of the absence of a belief"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bible Verses are for definition
1.The above are my definitions.
2. I am not refusing to address logical arguments that are reasons, just skip past a lot of opinions.
3.Necessary conclusion.
P1. If X is true then Y is true
P2. X is true
(If the above premises are true then the conclusion):
C. Y is true necessarily.
4. It is a true premise that the bible/your god indicates that children can be killed.
So? It is a true premise that people die.
5. Notes - All G(s) are to quote As who often say they believe not in G or gs of any kind.
That's not a "necessary" conclusion, only a conclusion. It's the believers that use it's "necessary" when not necessary to prop up arguments for their god. So ya blew that one. Definition fail.
You admit that bible verses define your god then, great. Then by definition your god provides direction for the killing of children and that is my logical rational reason for not believing in your god. Logical win.
Don't change the goal post. Yes people die all of the time. Does god give directions for people to kill others in all of these deaths? Nope. Logical fail.
Post #258, you stated that:"Merciful G must exist as there are multiple G(s) around sounds like a logical reason to me. Your not going to tell me G isn't merciful." What are your biblical "multiple gods"?
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.