Ybe an atheist

[Abaddon_ire]

So I have seen sufficient evidence to believe in a god?
Which evidence is that?

I think you said you haven't seen sufficient evidence so you have seen evidence.
It is an opinion unless you can prove all evidence you have seen is not sufficient.
And that you are able to reason about evidence logically and properly.
And that you are not denying the evidence for whatever reason.

So back to the Q.

No, it isn't that there is insufficient evidence, it is that THERE IS NO EVIDENCE AT ALL

That god definitely does not exist.

Yet, another reason to ask what logical reason do you have for being an A?

IF you spent 30 years giving reasons for your above statement, if they are illogical,l So what?

You fail. What you are attempting is to claim that no evidence for a deity is a reason to believe in that imaginary being. That is simply stupidly illogical.

That's not a "necessary" conclusion, only a conclusion. It's the believers that use it's "necessary" when not necessary to prop up arguments for their god. So ya blew that one. Definition fail. 

When the premises are true and the conclusion  is the only possible conclusion that can be concluded given the premises, then you have my definition of
a "necessary" conclusion...

Your premises are not true.

IS THERE ANYONE OUT THERE THAT CAN HELP THESE GUYS?

I AM LEAVING AND WHEN I COME BACK I HOPE SOMETHING MORE SUBSTANTIAL CAN BE MUSTERED.

You have yet to present anything of substance. If you return, hopefully you will have learned basic logic. And spelling. And grammar.