Ybe an atheist

[Abaddon_ire]

You are incoherent, but I shall endeavour to lend a machete to your intellectual thicket.

Wrong. Absent any evidence, why, logically speaking, would you accept any damn fool idea? There is no evidence for unicorns, dragons or talking donkeys either. Is it reasonable to assume those exist too? Simply by having no evidence?

_________________________________________________________________________________________
|   YB: 1. If As had  logically supported reasonable reasons, then they would give them

We did. Your obvious illiteracy prevented you from reading those responses.

Abaddon_ire: We do, we gave them, you promptly ignored them.2. they admit they are opinions or have trouble seeing that they are
     Define "E". Then explain which orifice you pulled the term "supreme logic" out of. Nobody used any such term until you invented it out of whole 
    cloth.

Learn to use the quote function. You have mashed up my words in order to do....something. It is hard to discern what you intended because of the incoherent nonsense.

YB: [/b]Re. "Absent any evidence"   Before we get your logical reasonable proof that "there is no evidence for Unicorns" etc. Could you prove that you can logically discern any evidence given for G  or (U,D or TD), with reasonable logical proof?

LOLWUT?
 
You have evidence for unicorns? Feel free to share.

(What ever type of  E is given to you for whatever?)  

Incoherent sentence fragment.

Re ire: We do, we gave them, you promptly ignored them.
YB: Can you prove how (explaining that an assertion isn't logical something considered logical  proof) means what you gave was ignored?
Re ire: which ???? you pulled the term "supreme logic" out of. Nobody used any such...   #314

Who do you think you are talking to?

Gotta go again.  There is lots of sufficient/convincing evidence for G by the way.

G? G-force? G-spot? G what?

But the A's Ive heard around here so far have  been  disappointing,
they won't or can't prove  they have the ability to reason logically about evidence.

Oh I can happily reason about evidence for anything. The problem is that you have none.

Yet, they keep asking for E for G as if they have some standard or ability to reason logically about it.
Wow! If you can't prove you can reason logically about E.

Why would anyone go forward and even try to give E for G?

Keep trying. Eventually you will have an EGG.

Oh well, try to give it to Friday or Saturday and see if any logical reasoning is around.

Don't bother. You clearly know nothing about logic or reason, hell even basic spelling is a mythological far distant country to you.

I

You what?