(May 30, 2018 at 7:28 am)mh.brewer Wrote:(May 29, 2018 at 11:58 pm)Ybe Wrote: Sorry, here is a response for you. If no G, then no reason 4 responding.And there are people who say this clown isn't trolling...
That is a better response than yours, and exemplifies how As respond to me.
[/quote]
This caller was an idiot that just keeps talking in circles about a question that is not valid. Proof or evidence if not necessary to be an atheist. Some butt holes with their head up a child killers ass will never ever get this. Sound familiar?
[/quote]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
======================================
YB: The quote thing seems weird.
I was Googling, and happen to run across that video.
It has been my experience here, no proofs.
There are many proofs and evidences given for G. Example of just one. Proof.
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gödel%27s_...ical_proof)
There are many others and (also evidences) none of which I am trying to defend or present as to why one should be a theist.
The basics non proofs that atheists have given for the Q. (see first post of this thread) are pretty much like:
" because I don't believe in g(s) and it fits my definition of an A.
"oh, *?&9@* stupid troll"
"I don't believe those many proofs for G"
Or answering the Q with a Q:
" Did G write the B?
" Do you believe in S Us or Ds?"
================================================================