Running out of time.
I have heard argument that my Q has been answered.
Sorry, but not sufficiently as y'all well know.
I was hoping to get a good reason, but it is prima facie that As have no logical reason for being an A.
I wish I could spend more time, but from the current answers I don't forsee a sufficient reason for an being A coming.
Thanks I have enjoyed the discussion.
Here is a proof for G.
If no G, then no R
there is R
So not no G or G
R = reasoning the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way.
G you know G.
G is the support for R and everything:
- thinking the future will be like it was in the past
- why we call something good or evil
- Love
- logic
Bye for now tommorrow is Friday and I have to work early and so time is up.... its 12 am here Friday
I have heard argument that my Q has been answered.
Sorry, but not sufficiently as y'all well know.
I was hoping to get a good reason, but it is prima facie that As have no logical reason for being an A.
I wish I could spend more time, but from the current answers I don't forsee a sufficient reason for an being A coming.
Thanks I have enjoyed the discussion.
Here is a proof for G.
If no G, then no R
there is R
So not no G or G
R = reasoning the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way.
G you know G.
G is the support for R and everything:
- thinking the future will be like it was in the past
- why we call something good or evil
- Love
- logic
Bye for now tommorrow is Friday and I have to work early and so time is up.... its 12 am here Friday