(June 1, 2018 at 3:00 am)Ybe Wrote: Running out of time.
I have heard argument that my Q has been answered.
Sorry, but not sufficiently as y'all well know.
I was hoping to get a good reason, but it is prima facie that As have no logical reason for being an A.
I wish I could spend more time, but from the current answers I don't forsee a sufficient reason for an being A coming.
Thanks I have enjoyed the discussion.
Here is a proof for G.
If no G, then no R
there is R
So not no G or G
R = reasoning the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way.
G you know G.
G is the support for R and everything:
- thinking the future will be like it was in the past
- why we call something good or evil
- Love
- logic
Bye for now tommorrow is Friday and I have to work early and so time is up.... its 12 am here Friday
"Sorry, but not sufficiently as y'all well know." Your question was answered perfectly and honestly in the first few pages.
"If no G, then no R" If no God then there is no Reasoning -- well, if you start with a fallacy, it's no wonder you fail.
"G is the support for R and everything:" -- another fallacy.
Until concrete scientific proof that a deity is presented, you cannot start an argument with "God Is" of any sort.
I can say "God ISN'T" - - you didn't provide proof that it exists, I cannot provide proof that it doesn't, so any argument is a waste of time.
Have fun wasting your life talking to something that isn't there.
![[Image: c2cd5c760468e2e0c0e5d1d5c5137cd0.jpg]](https://i.pinimg.com/564x/c2/cd/5c/c2cd5c760468e2e0c0e5d1d5c5137cd0.jpg)
"The family that prays together...is brainwashing their children."- Albert Einstein