Dawkins is a good biologist and proponent of evolutionary theory but beyond that I don't rate him at all.
And DD, I already explained to you - Nobody even remotely familiar with physics will claim that something came from "nothing", at least not "nothing" in the terms you are picturing it, the conservation of energy and information are two physical principles defended by all prominent physicists, their existence alone necessitates that "nothing" is a misnomer.
And DD, I already explained to you - Nobody even remotely familiar with physics will claim that something came from "nothing", at least not "nothing" in the terms you are picturing it, the conservation of energy and information are two physical principles defended by all prominent physicists, their existence alone necessitates that "nothing" is a misnomer.
.
