RE: Amazing resources from Wikipedia.
June 6, 2018 at 11:13 am
(This post was last modified: June 6, 2018 at 11:22 am by RoadRunner79.)
(June 6, 2018 at 8:12 am)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote:(June 6, 2018 at 7:35 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: I don’t believe that was what GC was arguing. I for one, wouldn’t expect scholars (even Christian ones) to let the doctrine of inerrancy interfere with the historical work.
Ken Ham does exactly that. "It's right because it's in the Bible."
What does Ken Ham have to do with this?
(June 6, 2018 at 8:19 am)Jehanne Wrote:(June 6, 2018 at 7:35 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: I don’t believe that was what GC was arguing. I for one, wouldn’t expect scholars (even Christian ones) to let the doctrine of inerrancy interfere with the historical work.
I don’t think one’s needs a PHD to know that if you can get to Y from X and you can get to Z from X, then one could travel from X to Y to Z. Possibly with other places that where not mentioned in between. This isn’t rocket science that we need to appeal to authority.
The historical evidence is that the author of Mark was not from Palestine, hence, his ignorance of the region's geography.
Evidence like the bad arguments in the OP? I don't put a lot of stock in the argument of Jesus must walk in a straight line.
But if you would like to make the case, and present your evidence. Go right ahead.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
