(June 16, 2018 at 7:14 pm)Haipule Wrote:(June 16, 2018 at 3:57 am)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: Ah, the old "science is always changing" bullshit argument. Thanks for letting me know I can safely ignore anything you have to say.Dude! Did I tell a lie? And, I didn't argue a fucking thing! Thank God that science is in a constant state of flux! Sometimes, the only way to learn how things work is to completely fuck it up first so that we are armed with more info to do it better next time, and the next, and the next. Yet, the idea of pushing the limits of are societal minded selves beyond any constraints is to be a free thinker.
Why do you limit yourself by rejecting the One Whom caused all this to Exist? What? Are you just a part of evolution? Fuck that shit!!!
One wonders what god's excuse is for the complete fuckups, as there's no evidence of anything being done better the next time.
I got stuck on your phrasing, "the One Whom caused." It's going to be a neat trick if your god causes and is caused at the same time--I think there are some branches of philosophy/theology that posit this as a position for god. I don't find that characterization of god one that merits worship or any move on the part of humans. In fact, a subject/object god is mostly a kind of authoritarian tautology... Probably it's just a grammatical error by you, so here is a quick and easy tutorial on who/whom, quoted from grammarly.com: "Whom should be used to refer to the object of a verb or preposition. When in doubt, try this simple trick: If you can replace the word with “he”' or “'she,” use who. If you can replace it with “him” or “her,” use whom. Who should be used to refer to the subject of a sentence."


