Atheism & Bisexuality

[Violet]

But isn't beauty magnificent? And isn't magnificence (at least often) beautiful?

EvF

I have redefined many terms in response to new knowledge. For example... feminines did not come after masculines, but rather before, or at the same time, as them. I therefore no longer called them female and male. I later realized the differance between gender and sex, and still later observed that gender could describe several characteristics in objects, animals, artwork, and even music.

As these are my personally redefined terms, i understand that many have completely differant understandings for them. But even under my understandings... you are nearly correct. Beauty is magnificent, as magnificence is beautiful. For the longest time... i could find only vague differances between the two.

But then i came upon the realization of the Androgene: that which contains both beauty and magnificence, yet is neither. It is the curveture that connects both the Feminine and the Masculine. Without this spacing.... there can be no defining point for having both genders.

It is the lack of gender that gender is built upon... just as it is your skeleton that your muscles are built upon. Without this curveture: one would be a messy mass of angles and arcs. I then understood that beauty and magnificence were only defined by the rate of this curveture. Beauty is a dull curve, whereas masculinity is the sharp. The in-between curvetures are individually defined grey areas, with masculinity on one end, blurring into androgenity in the middle, blurring into beauty towards the other end.

That is the differance to me... think of it what you will. I arrived at these lines of thoughts by asking myself things like: 'why is beauty beautiful?'. I am sure that you will (or already have) come up with your own answers