(June 29, 2018 at 4:06 pm)Whateverist Wrote: Perhaps he just isn't as interested in that red herring as you are?
You have an objection based on some amount of information you find missing and needed for you to accept evolution. What you seem to need isn't what anyone who actually knows the field needs or finds relevant. No responds to your objection, therefore you want to conclude it is because your objection is killer and undermines the entire field. Go ahead, knock over all the pieces, shit on the board even; if that doesn't prove you win the debate, what will?
You really don't understand. This is the heart of the debate, and so if one side is offering evidence for it, and the other is running away and not addressing it, that speaks volumes where the true proofs and who really has the evidence. All the other stuff for the theory are sideline issues.
