RE: Why believe the bible?
July 11, 2018 at 4:59 pm
(This post was last modified: July 11, 2018 at 5:01 pm by Angrboda.)
Well, let's see whether your latest bit of stupidity amounts to anything.
Here is your original claim:
So let's see what your latest response brings us.
This reference refers to a finding about intra-neural communication and so is not relevant to your claim. Strike one!
Who the fuck cares? This isn't evidence. That's strike two!
Again, this is about internal communication and so is not relevant. Three strikes and you're out!
Seriously? You're quoting a blog about Abraham Hicks and the Law of Attraction. Nobody is disputing that as an electrical device the brain emits electromagnetic radiation, what is in dispute is whether it sends and receives signals in the way you hypothesize. Nothing that you've presented supports the latter.
Irrefutable evidence that's been refuted. Yay Drich.
You have to be one of the most deluded fucks on this forum. What goes on in your head is a fantasy that bears only tangential relationship to reality.
As I pointed out in that thread, and which you have yet to come to grips with, "The issue is not does it transmit and receive signals, but does it transmit and receive signals in the specific way required by the brain as receiver hypothesis?" Nothing that you've posted in that thread or this one supports the latter.
Here is your original claim:
(May 31, 2018 at 4:28 pm)Drich Wrote: In short the brain is not the host or contains consciousness. that the brain is a simple receiver of memory and consciousness. nothing is stored in the brain it is mearly a relay point breaking down our sensor experience and transmitting it to our consciousness and vise versa.....So the beggs the question where is our consciousness stored? the scientific answer is in an alternate dimension, meaning we die here and wake up there... Which to me sounds alot like heaven... "absent from the body present with the lord."
So let's see what your latest response brings us.
(July 11, 2018 at 1:07 pm)Drich Wrote:(July 11, 2018 at 2:21 am)Mathilda Wrote: I've noticed, and it certainly applies to myself, that Drich's ideas are getting so moronic that people aren't even bothering to argue with him beyond initially pointing out why he is wrong, that is if they can be arsed. He seems to have reached Little Rik levels of moronicity.
Not my idea old sport.. is your mind that frail? I posted two articles and simply asked for thoughts on what science is now saying about the brain, but you two old hens are so closed minded even to scientific discovery, if it comes from a christian reader/not even a christian source. that you look like morons when the truth is revealed..
here is the first mentioning of this scientific idea and the very same 'proof" I used.
https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg1...-receiver/
You two did not consider it which means you are not privy or understand how scientific evidence is presented if not provided to you in a predigest format, EG:Signed by scientific source.
This reference refers to a finding about intra-neural communication and so is not relevant to your claim. Strike one!
(May 31, 2018 at 4:28 pm)Drich Wrote: here is a blogger who quotes tesla by saying his mind were receiver:
https://mikemurphyunfiltered.com/know-br...ansmitter/
Which put me in pretty good company if we all three view the mind the same way and I AND NEVER BEFORE NOW BEEN INSTRUCTED TO DO SO!
Who the fuck cares? This isn't evidence. That's strike two!
(May 31, 2018 at 4:28 pm)Drich Wrote: here is a more modern take:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20...133713.htm
Again, this is about internal communication and so is not relevant. Three strikes and you're out!
(May 31, 2018 at 4:28 pm)Drich Wrote: here is a chart of the actual frequencies:
https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=...4065521620
Seriously? You're quoting a blog about Abraham Hicks and the Law of Attraction. Nobody is disputing that as an electrical device the brain emits electromagnetic radiation, what is in dispute is whether it sends and receives signals in the way you hypothesize. Nothing that you've presented supports the latter.
(May 31, 2018 at 4:28 pm)Drich Wrote: All I said/added is this new discovery lends itself with the scriptural interpretation of death/resurrection.
Again irrefutible evidence everything I said is contain with in these reference points. The only thing left to question is how far/to what end does the brain transmit and receive
Irrefutable evidence that's been refuted. Yay Drich.
(May 31, 2018 at 4:28 pm)Drich Wrote: You two are such a small minded petty people you never even thought one to consider that i was not just make something you never heard of up... you really thought there was no scientific basis to anything I said, BOOM Bitch! Get out the way get out the way!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgg2tCtR8Yw
You have to be one of the most deluded fucks on this forum. What goes on in your head is a fantasy that bears only tangential relationship to reality.
As I pointed out in that thread, and which you have yet to come to grips with, "The issue is not does it transmit and receive signals, but does it transmit and receive signals in the specific way required by the brain as receiver hypothesis?" Nothing that you've posted in that thread or this one supports the latter.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)