RE: "Jesus would rather kill, not marry, gay people" - Franklin Graham
July 16, 2018 at 4:21 pm
(This post was last modified: July 16, 2018 at 4:32 pm by Brian37.)
(July 16, 2018 at 4:16 pm)Tizheruk Wrote:(July 16, 2018 at 4:14 pm)robvalue Wrote: The only concern I would have is the complexity of the contract. But otherwise, sure.While true the legality would be complex so is any legal contract between multiple parties (because that's what modern marriage is )
(July 16, 2018 at 4:16 pm)Brian37 Wrote: I don't because the more people involved the more needless rivalry arises, and it isn't atheist that promote this, but religion.I didn't say there would be no issues but all relationships have those .
I agree with consent, but the more people involved psychologically, in a marriage, not merely a one time fling, the more potential for needless conflict and power struggles.
Right, the religious love to see marriage as some magical thing handed down to them by a super hero, but in reality the real history is that it has always been a financial contract promising to support another person. This is where the religious morons claim "marriage is about love". I did not claim it should not be about love. It should be, but love is not a patent owned or invented by one label.
And love is also knowing, that utopias don't exist and sometimes things don't work out, and sometimes letting go is the best love you can give.