(July 16, 2018 at 1:27 am)Godscreated Wrote: The skeptics here and every where do not want the town of Nazareth to have existed during Christ time, it would move them one step closer to looking for the truth. It was recorded in a 1st century writing, so yes it was there.
GC
Funny how we're skeptical of just the things that have little evidence. If Nazareth is ever confirmed to be a community that the proposed Jesus of history could have lived in, there are a host of other problems with the story (the slaughter of the innocents being one of the biggest). It's no skin off my nose if Nazareth is real, if archaeology confirms it, I'll happily turn my hat to the 'Nazareth was real then' side. And that's EVEN if you're right about my motive being to deny Jesus. Your claims about other people's motives is one of the main things that makes you an asshat, btw.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
