(September 15, 2011 at 7:05 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote:(September 15, 2011 at 6:57 am)bozo Wrote:(September 15, 2011 at 5:49 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote:(September 15, 2011 at 5:34 am)bozo Wrote:(September 15, 2011 at 5:27 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote: Thing is...Did the defendant actually display the "Golliwog" or is the complainant just being racist??
It was in her window
The lawyer will argue this point I am thinking. Inside her window or outside?? Did SHE ACTUALLY put it there or was there so other agent (say a child) who put the TOY in the window?? And we ARE watching a pair of old biddies with million dollar dwellings arguing as litigation is now the NEW way of saying "Hiwelcome to the neigbourhood?? They must have very sad and lonely lives is my thinking.
I have a dildo easily viewed through my window...WTF are YOU doing perving in through MY window??Get A Life!! Grr
Indeed, the lawyers will put both cases.
Indeed. My point being a) we have two old biddies that don't have a life and b) just how did the Golliwog get to the window and was it intentional??
Quite frankly I am thinking it is a distraction for the UK for the mess it is in. This is the best your tabloids can come up with??Not any different to Australlias then...
How do you or I or anybody know what sort of a life these women live? The defendant has already said she thinks a child put it there.
The court will either believe that or not.
Unlike you, I think this case is significant because of its nature.
And I prefer reading a serious story to pages of " celebrity " antics which unfortunately dominate many of our papers.
A man is born to a virgin mother, lives, dies, comes alive again and then disappears into the clouds to become his Dad. How likely is that?
