Atheism

[RoadRunner79]

---

Take the same reasoning, and apply it to anything else that is designed.

I just pointed out you can't apply it because were not talking about known designed things let alone man made things

 The conclusion doesn't follow.  

he conclusion this comparison fails yes yes it does follow 

So you saying that it is an invalid analogy, with no reason given... doesn't mean very much to me. 

I don't care what matters to you this analogy is not alike seriously you thin a man who boasts of his intelligence would see that .

 If you care to reason through this, and show where I am wrong, then I'll listen.  

No you won't you'll just cook up another nonsensical text block  

 If you just want to say NO!  and lalalalalala  with your fingers stuck in your ears, then so be it.

No i imagine that will be you role in this conversation along with baseless accusations that it's what i'm doing

I'll treat it the same way I do a 3 year old, when they throw a tantrum.

Funny that's what i imagine my role in this conversation will be

---

Ok, so the reasoning only follows if the designer was wanting to, and/or capable of making an optimal design (apparently as determined by you). So then if either of these premises are false, then the conclusion is invalid.