(July 26, 2018 at 3:31 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote:(July 26, 2018 at 9:50 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: We're not idiotic enough to suppose those less likely or impossible alternatives are more likely to be true than the more obvious explanation. Bayesian inference. Occam's Razor.
Why would bombs be a more obvious explanation than dragons? I've never seen a bomb, in fact, bombs, as far as I know, appear to contradict the Second Law of Thermodynamics. But I see flying animals every single day.
I'm not sure which is more pathetic: someone who is profoundly idiotic or someone who pretends to be profoundly idiotic.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.