The OP assumed the existence of God in his post. The whole question is predicated on that, so I am confused as to your reply here.
If you want to talk about evidence, we can do so. I will start by saying the absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence. However, I do think there are good reasons to believe that God exists, simply from a logical standpoint.
If you want to talk about evidence, we can do so. I will start by saying the absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence. However, I do think there are good reasons to believe that God exists, simply from a logical standpoint.
(September 16, 2011 at 11:07 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Well, let's examine. There is no evidence that god exists. The rest of your post is comprised entirely of your opinions. Well, I think vanilla is better than chocolate, and this absolutely refutes whatever it is you have to say.
