Ontological Disproof of God

[negatio]

In truth, I gave up halfway through your magnum opus here.  You had started to be repetitious.  I have no trouble understanding Sartre.  It's your argument that I have difficulty with.  At best, whatever point you have attempted to make has been obscured by your generally shitty exposition of it.

  I surely do indeed appear to be repetitious, I am wholly and radically repetitious, while, all the while, it is merely that the most fundamental tenant of my writing style is to clearly repeat each cardinal feature, as I spiral upward to a full explanation of what I shall, finally,  fully proffer regarding a particular point of discussion .  I cannot stand writers who continually use the radically vague terms "this"/"that", to refer back to their subject , instead of clearly enunciating the particular subject over and over again, in the attempt to be consistently clear, even though the entire ensemble, at first glance, appears to the reader to be unintelligible nonsense, presented via shit language, while, all the while, it is the reader\'s lack of education and reflection within the particular arena the auteur is engaging, which gives the reader the appearance that the author is failing to properly say what the author is saying, in the only possible way which he can, while attempting, in this case, to communicate entirely negative constructs to wholly positivist readers, who have, given their positivist world view, little qualification for following nihilative reasoning

---

One's worldview doesn't factor into it. Your meaning isn't clear. You should write in a way that anyone with any worldview can understand. Spinoza did. Sartre did. You can too.

As has been pointed out, you mention America several times in your argument. It is unclear how America is relevant to a disproof of God. Maybe it would help if you removed any and all irrelevant portions of the argument.

  America is not mentioned in the proximal portion of the essay wherein I posit my ontological disproof of Deity as we currently think of deity, when I subsequently turn to destructivecritique of the American legal system, which system is predicated upon Biblical Deity attempting to control and judge mankind, that I repeatedly employ America/American, because, it is the American legal system which my language has, purely upon a theoretical plane, detotalized by describing what I dub jurisprudential illusion.  Duane C.

Moderator Notice
Edited to fix quotes