OP, well, for starters, you could put down the thesaurus and write according to the audience you purportedly want to reach. What you think is style is merely obfuscation. Rather than clearly expressing your ideas, you seem to simply enjoy appearing intelligent by throwing as many superfluous words into the mix as you can muster. It's anything but impressive.
In my experience, those who have truly mastered what they claim to know can express even complex ideas plainly. Rather than complain that we're, essentially, too dumb and/or lazy to understand you, maybe take a crack at meeting us halfway? After all, you're the one proclaiming that your treatise has value. One would think you'd want it to be accessible. Otherwise, your persistent tut-tutting merely shows you to be a snob, providing evidence to my accusation above.
Assuming you're not simply an internet troll that's dialed the stereotypical online atheist persona up to 11, of course.
In my experience, those who have truly mastered what they claim to know can express even complex ideas plainly. Rather than complain that we're, essentially, too dumb and/or lazy to understand you, maybe take a crack at meeting us halfway? After all, you're the one proclaiming that your treatise has value. One would think you'd want it to be accessible. Otherwise, your persistent tut-tutting merely shows you to be a snob, providing evidence to my accusation above.
Assuming you're not simply an internet troll that's dialed the stereotypical online atheist persona up to 11, of course.
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
