RE: Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Round 2
August 21, 2018 at 2:24 am
(This post was last modified: August 21, 2018 at 2:27 am by SaStrike.)
(August 20, 2018 at 6:41 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:(August 20, 2018 at 6:07 pm)SaStrike Wrote: A union or marriage is an act! Also that's a lot of words for semantics that wouldn't fly in court at all.
I feel sorry for the people being discriminated against but hey the court has spoken.
I wouldn't want to go to a store and be denied service or products because of who I am or because my views are different. Why should trans people? But I guess there will always be ignorance and stupidity. I know for a fact that forcing the fools by law to serve me wouldn't actually change their negativity towards me. (In fact might make it worse!)
So might as well go elsewhere
If your posts in this thread are any indication, you know fuckall about what the law and the courts have to say on the matter.
So I'm going to take your opinion with a huge grain of salt.
(And no, the bible sanctioned homosexual sex specifically, not all acts by homosexuals, so your bullshit about it being a semantic argument is just that: bullshit.)
So two men having sex is forbidden in the bible, but two men getting married is fine and christians are just choosing to add that since it's not literally mentioned. Lol ok. I can see that working, don't become a lawyer though, stick to debating borderline "genius" theists, like little rik and mk.
