RE: Ontological Disproof of God
August 21, 2018 at 9:23 am
(This post was last modified: August 26, 2018 at 1:12 am by Losty.)
(August 20, 2018 at 9:46 pm)emjay Wrote: Dude, it's:
Somehow you're putting the content to quote inside the opening quote tag, after the equals sign, where the author is supposed to go... instead of between the opening and closing quote tags.Code:[quote='author']
Content to quote
[/quote]
(August 21, 2018 at 5:16 am)Abaddon_ire Wrote: 1. You are too lazy to learn how the quote function works.
2. You are too lazy to learn how to effectively express yourself.
3. Hell, you are even too lazy to learn what paragraphs are even for.
Given that demonstrable laziness, why, exactly, should anyone here bother to wade through your intentionally obfuscated walls of text?
Since you are too lazy, uneducated, and unreflective to engage in polemic regarding my position, which describes jurisprudential illusion among the American doctors of jurisprudence who mediate our legal system, the very best you can do is set forth a fallacious and imbecilic argumentum ad hominem ungraciously directed against my person. I am on what you deem to be your forum for just about one day, and, suddenly I am quoting authors absolutely incorrectly; not writing simply enough for simpletons like you; and not cognizant of paragraphs, when, in fact, my writing methodology consists in discrete fragments. Now that I am on your forum, I either have to do things precisely your particular way, and, straighten up and fly it right, or, be subjected to senseless insults posited by the ire of a stupid-ass bully ! This is truly throwing one\s pearls before swine...Other persons on this forum were extremely polite and gracious in their attempt to convert me to what they deem to be requisite proper behavior upon this site --- deeming me to be a fool in the most kind possible way; but what can your pre-established quotation norms and, simplistic demands to reduce myself to simple simplicity, for the sake of simple simpletons, possibly mean to me, an absolutely absolute reflectively free ontological freedom, able to theoretically overthrow both Deity and Law ! ? I am not going to jump when a stupid chump like you says "frog", even if I appear, to your ignorant density, to be just so plain stupid that I am intentionally obfuscating my writing. I do not obfuscate; what you see as obfuscation is merely your ignorant inability to comprehend slight poetic complexity, readily dissolved via straightforward toughminded study on your part, which you are too infinitely lazy and inherently incapable of accomplishing in any case, foolish fool.
Moderator Notice
Edited to fix quote
Edited to fix quote