RE: Ontological Disproof of God
August 21, 2018 at 11:37 am
(This post was last modified: August 21, 2018 at 11:39 am by I_am_not_mafia.)
This is all that comes up when I hit reply:
This is what you actually wrote (the bit in bold got lopped off)
I noticed this because I wanted to reply to this bit:
Still, as a troll, he's made over twice as many pages as Alexmahome.
(August 21, 2018 at 11:27 am)negatio Wrote: All this constant nippicking at my person regarding something as trite as not employing one particular way of referencing, among many ways extant across the world...Why don\'t you undertake a possibly productive attack against my writing, and get beyond the inane pleasure you appear to take from repeatedly asserting yourself right, while I am wrong...perhaps I am indeed wrong, from a certain nerdish perspective, okay, so what !? Demonstrate me wrong regarding something really significantly serious concerning my written position(s). Is it that you can nor more do that than I can do computer code ?! If the best that everyone can do is constantly harp on some trite little purportedly correct site syntax, it strikes me as so absolutely shallow a consideration that it is nauseating. Wow, I entered a strange new forum world and, persons there can do little more that peck and peck regarding some idiosyncratic referencing formality I
This is what you actually wrote (the bit in bold got lopped off)
Quote:All this constant nippicking at my person regarding something as trite as not employing one particular way of referencing, among many ways extant across the world...Why don\t you undertake a possibly productive attack against my writing, and get beyond the inane pleasure you appear to take from repeatedly asserting yourself right, while I am wrong...perhaps I am indeed wrong, from a certain nerdish perspective, okay, so what !? Demonstrate me wrong regarding something really significantly serious concerning my written position(s). Is it that you can nor more do that than I can do computer code ?! If the best that everyone can do is constantly harp on some trite little purportedly correct site syntax, it strikes me as so absolutely shallow a consideration that it is nauseating. Wow, I entered a strange new forum world and, persons there can do little more that peck and peck regarding some idiosyncratic referencing formality I've never heard of; how important can that possibly be to me !? Not very. Find something regarding my writing that might be important to peck at; however, you cannot even begin to follow what I am writing about, ( all you appear to possibly do is wine on and on, repeatedly demanding simplicity and, complaining regarding a mere meaningless absence of a certain nerd-exactness in computer code procedure), much less set forth a rational polemic against a position which you cannot fathom. Oh, yes, it is absolutely my fault that forum members cannot follow my position...I am intentionally obfuscating; merely showing off my vocabulary; purposely lacking simplicity...and, if I don't leap at my chance to conduct myself in absolute accord with the basic ilk of computer law transpiring within this site, I am to be discarded as a wrong, disobedient, peon ! Wow, I'm crushed; defeated, wow, big deal, I'll have to seek therapy to get over the trauma...
I noticed this because I wanted to reply to this bit:
Quote:I am intentionally obfuscating; merely showing off my vocabulary;
Still, as a troll, he's made over twice as many pages as Alexmahome.
