RE: Ontological Disproof of God
August 21, 2018 at 11:39 am
(This post was last modified: August 21, 2018 at 11:42 am by Abaddon_ire.)
(August 21, 2018 at 11:27 am)negatio Wrote: All this constant nippicking at my person regarding something as trite as not employing one particular way of referencing, among many ways extant across the world...Why don't you read my last post instead of this incessant whining?
(August 21, 2018 at 11:27 am)negatio Wrote: Why don\t you undertake a possibly productive attack against my writing, and get beyond the inane pleasure you appear to take from repeatedly asserting yourself right, while I am wrong...perhaps I am indeed wrong, from a certain nerdish perspective, okay, so what !? Demonstrate me wrong regarding something really significantly serious concerning my written position(s).Why should I? It would take too long to parse and you wouldn't read it anyway.
(August 21, 2018 at 11:27 am)negatio Wrote: Is it that you can nor more do that than I can do computer code ?! If the best that everyone can do is constantly harp on some trite little purportedly correct site syntax, it strikes me as so absolutely shallow a consideration that it is nauseating. Wow, I entered a strange new forum world and, persons there can do little more that peck and peck regarding some idiosyncratic referencing formality I've never heard of; how important can that possibly be to me !? Not very.So clarity of presentation is not important to you. Glad we cleared that up.
(August 21, 2018 at 11:27 am)negatio Wrote: Find something regarding my writing that might be important to peck at; however, you cannot even begin to follow what I am writing about, ( all you appear to possibly do is wine on and on, repeatedly demanding simplicity and, complaining regarding a mere meaningless absence of a certain nerd-exactness in computer code procedure), much less set forth a rational polemic against a position which you cannot fathom. Oh, yes, it is absolutely my fault that forum members cannot follow my position...I am intentionally obfuscating; merely showing off my vocabulary; purposely lacking simplicity...and, if I don't leap at my chance to conduct myself in absolute accord with the basic ilk of computer law transpiring within this site, I am to be discarded as a wrong, disobedient, peon ! Wow, I'm crushed; defeated, wow, big deal, I'll have to seek therapy to get over the trauma...No. If you as a student of mine turned in such a poorly presented paper as yours it would be an automatic fail.
(August 21, 2018 at 11:37 am)Mathilda Wrote: <snip for brevity>The forum trims the amount of text contained in the quote tags.
Another reason for negatio to learn to do it right.
