Ontological Disproof of God

[negatio]

Add a blank line between individual paragraphs.

I absolutely and wholeheartedly agree. I really did want it to be double spaced; am just so totally inept at using this site that it did not happen...I can now just barely quote and respond to members, and members are still expressing their amazement at my inability to do certain things they deem to be radically simple and normal, I just have no idea how to efficiently do all they think I should be able to do at this time.
You provided the dialectic which did ultimately produce a new realization, i.e., my rewrite. Then, meeting Emjay and Kernel Sohcahtoa, who are being wonderful to me, put me on the natural high whereby I sped right through the rewrite.

---

@Neg: It sounds like you’re conflating physical laws with man-made, punishment based laws.

No. When I say that language of law exists as material, as ink on a page, or vocal vibrations, I am clarifying the fact that language of law is a real, given, factual, material thing, because, I needed to show that man made jurisprudential law is a physical thing, and, given, factual, material things are not efficient to cause a man to act or to refrain from acting; for men act only on the basis of non-existant, objectively absent nothingnesses...

---

It sounds like you're telling me that your argument can't deal with a brute fact.

You've completely lost me here, I do not follow you, what brute fact ?

"...you might even have misattributed the incompetence central to your argument..."
You write excellently, however, at first glance your statements are not immediately apprehensible, I think that by ''misattributed'' you mean that I am mistaken in saying Christ is mistaken ! I'm certain I am not mistaken, if you could demonstrate that, such would constitute a heavy and enjoyable possibly productive dialectic between us. Feel free to attempt to destroy and exhibit any defeasibility you think you see in my discourse !